BASF VENEZOLANA S.A.  

THE COMPANY

BASF is the acronym for BADISCHE ANILIN UND SODA FABRIK, a company founded in Germany in 1865. A pioneer in the manufacture of dyes and coloring agents, it currently has 350 subsidiaries in 35 countries, producing a wide range of chemical products. BASF has customers in 160 countries and approximately 120,000 employees on five continents.

The company first arrived in Venezuela in 1948, with imported fertilizer products. In 1967 it became incorporated as BASF Venezolana S.A., beginning operations in 1970. In 1972 it produced the first polymeric dispersions and solutions; in 1986 it began production of vitamin and mineral premixes for animal feeds; and in 1991 it opened one of the most modern styrene-butadiene dispersion plants in Latin America and expanded its production capacity for acrylic dispersions.

BASF Venezolana S.A. manufactures approximately 80 chemical products: acrylic polymeric and styrene-butadiene dispersions for the adhesive, paper, construction, paint, and textile markets, among others; supplementary products for paper, leather, textiles, and cosmetics; copolymers for the detergent manufacturing industry; and pigment preparations for leather, textiles, and special chemicals. The animal feed plant produces 58 premix formulations.

The company has an industrial plant in Turmero, Aragua, and a business office in Caracas. It currently employs 206 direct and indirect workers, and is number three among the group’s affiliates in Latin America, after Brazil and Mexico. The Turmero plant is in the Güere Industrial Area and occupies an area of 16.1 hectares , 30% of which is occupied by manufacturing facilities, 5% by environmental control facilities, and the remaining 65% by landscaped area.

CURRENT SITUATION

Business activities at BASF Venezolana S.A. focus on the production of marketable goods. In the process, wastes are also generated that have no apparent use but possess a wide range of compositions and physical features.

To prevent environmental pollution and protect personnel from improper waste handling, the company developed a Comprehensive Waste-Handling Program. This program is mandatory and was created under corporate headquarters guidelines and in accordance with the country’s legislation on waste.

From 1990 to 1996, a Michaelis Cd-9s incinerator furnace was used to incinerate solid waste, packing material, and other solid organic wastes. The Michaelis furnace operates with a main fixed-bed incineration chamber with a working temperature between 800 and 900°C, and an afterburner chamber for gases whose temperature reaches up to 1000°C. Both chambers use fuel oil burners with an average consumption rate of 25 kilograms per hour each. This equipment has a cyclone scrubber array for retaining dust before it goes out the stack. Incineration gases are mixed with cold air to lower exit temperature to 220°C. The total amount of gases emitted is approximately 6,000 cubic meters per hour.

Because of its simple design, this furnace is not fully adequate for all the different types of wastes that are generated in the chemical industry. For example, the furnace does not enable proper intake of spongy wastes, nor does it have any kind of device for stoking or agitating to improve the burning of the wastes being incinerated. The latter problem was what caused this equipment finally to go out of service, because the bottom layers of waste that were in direct contact with the refractory furnace floor did not receive any oxygen for combustion nor any direct flame from the burner, but they did receive conducted heat. This resulted in such a violent concentration of gases that an intense fire erupted inside the equipment and caused serious damage to the refractory lining.

Due to the fact that this failure actually occurred inside the equipment, no personnel were injured, nor were other facilities damaged. Experts from corporate headquarters reviewed the incident and recommended that the equipment not be repaired because its technology was considered unsafe, its energy consumption was high, and it emissions generation had high pollution potential.

STRATEGY

Replacement of Michaelis Incinerator Furnace

In a search for an alternative for treating waste, BASF Venezolana S.A. did research on a nationwide scale and discovered that no technology existed that enabled it to be properly treated. The company then decided to invest in a new incinerator furnace whose design was safer from the environmental and operational points of view, and which would operate with natural gas.

In this replacement effort, BASF Venezolana S.A. contracted with the U.S. company RMT / Four Nines – ETSI to select the best alternative. After reviewing the features of plant wastes, they recommended replacing the existing Michaelis furnace with the following types of furnaces:

  • Rotary Furnace
  • Fluidized Bed Incinerator
  • Fixed Hearth Incinerator

Technical and financial proposals were requested from companies recognized worldwide in the manufacture of incinerators. The alternative selected and supported by corporate headquarters was submitted by the HAFNER GmbH company, which proposed equipment (the HAFNER Incinerator Furnace) that complied with all the specifications required for incineration of all the different types of wastes from BASF Venezolana S.A. This equipment not only complies with the strictest environmental requirements for atmospheric emissions but has the significant advantage of being modular—that is, further process units may be added on to it.

HAFNER Incinerator Furnace

The Michaelis furnace was replaced by a HAFNER, which is a rotary furnace with the following design criteria:

1) Normal features of wastes considered by equipment design:

Normal Waste Features

Heating Capacity

11,900 kJ/kg

Combustible Content

60%

Water Content

30%

Inert Material Content

10%

Carbon Content

       54.7%

Hydrogen Content

         6.8%

Oxygen Content

       35.8%

Nitrogen Content

         0.7%

Sulfur Content

1%

Chlorine Content

1%

      Source: BASF Venezolana S.A.

2) Air requirement for incineration: 2,097 nm3/h

3) Dry gas exiting furnace: 

Composition of Dry Gas Exiting Furnace (kg/h)

Nitrogen

2,083

Oxygen

   328

Carbon Dioxide

    361

Total Dry

2,773

          Source: BASF Venezolana S.A.

4) Total gas exiting furnace: 2,407 nm3/h

The HAFNER furnace’s main advantage is its great flexibility in handling the types and amounts of wastes that need to be eliminated. It enables higher incineration temperatures and longer contact times for incinerated wastes and gases. Because it is a rotary furnace, it can ensure complete burning of high organic content wastes, which are rendered inert. It can also be simultaneously fed with liquid, solid, and spongy wastes.

In achieving complete, safe destruction of wastes through burning, a large amount of oxygen is supplied and the natural gas burner is kept on at all times. Slag and gases are removed through an outlet from the rotary furnace. Following is a description of the way this HAFNER rotary furnace operates:

1) Intake System. This system breaks up solid waste into smaller pieces, which then fall into a concrete pit. A hydraulic claw then picks up the waste in portions and transfers them to the waste intake hopper tray, which is directly connected to the furnace.

2) Liquid Injection System. Liquid injection is performed at both the first and second chambers. Wastes with low flammability are injected into the first chamber, and highly flammable wastes into the second chamber. This system was built by the Maintenance Department of BASF Venezolana S.A.

3) Ash Removal System. Solid inert material remaining from the incineration process is conveyed to the bottom of the furnace and from there to a conveyer belt system. Slag or dry ash is picked up and packed in labeled drums for moving to storage.

4) Afterburner Chamber. Organic gas components generated during the incineration of waste in the rotary furnace have high stability when heated and therefore require special conditions so that they can be converted into simpler molecular forms such as CO2, H2O, SO2, NOx, and CO. The afterburner chamber enables an oxidation efficiency of up to 99.99% for organic gas components, due to the fact that it has an efficient system for supplying air, and provides turbulence, higher temperatures, and longer contact times.

 5) Particulate Filter. Hot gases with inert solid particles exiting the afterburner chamber are mixed with ambient air to bring their temperature down to approximately 200ºC, then are sent to the scrubber, where solid particulates are removed.

6) Gas Emissions Stack. The gas outlet stack is cylindrical and galvanized, and has protection against abrasion and heat. Clean gases are released into the atmosphere at a temperature of about 200°C, at a rate of 24 meters per second.

7) Emergency Relief. This is a pneumatic gate that opens if there are any breakdowns, power outages, or excess pressure, in order to avoid excessive accumulations of gases and the danger of equipment explosion.

In addition to technical advantages and operational safety, the HAFNER incinerator furnace also provides outstanding environmental benefits. It generates emissions that are less polluting because its two burners operate on natural gas. Wastes are also subjected to longer burning times and higher burning temperatures, all of which result in efficient destruction of wastes by incineration.

Due to the composition of natural gas, combustion is cleaner than with the use of fuel oil. For this reason, pollution by emissions generated by the HAFNER furnace is substantially less than for the Michaelis furnace. The following table illustrates some of the advantages of the HAFNER furnace.

Comparison of Michaelis and HAFNER Furnaces

  Furnace   Fuel

Usage (m3/mo)

Fuel Cost (U.S.$/mo)

Maximum Emissions of SO2*

(mg/m3)

Michaelis

Fuel Oil

36

3,941

84.5

HAFNER

Natural Gas

50,000

1,634

0

*Maximum concentration of SO2 at outlet, when wastes containing sulfur are being burned

OUTLOOK

BASF Venezolana S.A. is now developing the second phase of its HAFNER incinerator furnace project. In this stage, equipment for continuous measurement of gases exiting the furnace will be added, which will enable greater control of emissions to the atmosphere, thus contributing to the reduction of greenhouse effect gases. In a third stage of the project, improvements will be made to the system for  the intake and treatment of gases in order to produce even cleaner emissions.

CONCLUSIONS

The practice of incineration does provide one solution to the industrial waste-handling problem, but it also generates potentially contaminating gases that, when not efficiently handled, can contribute to air pollution. The technical features of the HAFNER incinerator furnaces are providing direct benefits through efficient waste destruction, greater operating safety for workers, and improved quality of the emissions that are generated.

BASF Venezolana S.A. has made a significant investment in this engineering effort, with very satisfying environmental and safety results for its personnel. This, in turn, is encouraging the company to continue improving its environmental performance and to invest in new projects to comply with the strictest environmental requirements in the market.

CONTACT

Zoraida Torrealba de Rodríguez
Chief, Department of Comprehensive Safety and Laboratories
BASF Venezolana S.A.
Avenida Principal de la Urbanización Industrial Güere
Sector La Julia
Turmero, Aragua, Venezuela
Tel. (58-2) 205 9560 / 205 9696
Fax (58-2) 205 9491
E-mail: zoraida.torrealba@basf-ven.com.ve